Making the Most and Accurate Code Review Services Beyond 2020

Introduction to Making the Most of Code Review Services

We can people writing about code reviews every now and then, especially about its importance. Well, there are a number of ways to get code reviews right on point and ensure that they are performed effectively and efficiently.

However, it is also essential to focus on the workflow planning required for efficient code reviews.

By proper planning, it is possible to release effective code reviews, yet, if they become burdensome, it may be best to review the team’s workflow instead of focusing on the team’s individual productivity.

Code Review is for the Entire Team 

Code reviews help developers in getting to know about the code that other developers have written. It helps them in learning from other’s mistakes and discovering new techniques.

All those involved in the process may take something different but this is the main reason why it is important to perform code reviews. some companies have a group of developers to write code and another group review that code, but this approach has a negative side.

When code writers are separated from code reviews can cause a tense atmosphere, where code reviewers critique code-writers as critics, not as peers.

Keep your Code Short 

Developers say that they need an hour’s code review process that is effective. If a review is expected to take more than an hour, it is best to split the process into sessions and take little breaks.

See also  Atlassian Crucible Static Code Analysis to Code Review

It is important a lengthy code review process is not that effective, and should also try to decompose the tasks into small ones, and allow reviewers to write smaller and more manageable chunks of code.

Don’t Review too Much Code at Once 

It becomes extremely difficult to review more than 200 lines of code at once, let alone reviewing 400 lines of code can be a nightmare for teams.

So it is important to take breaks during long code reviews. It is important to set up the workflow so that developers can write small chunks of code and review it.

If it is not possible to break down the code into sufficiently small chunks for some reason, then another option would be to hold code reviews before completing the code.

With the help of frequent code reviews, developers can progress and refrain teams from performing mistakes before they occur.

If teams have a limited and it is not possible to allocate all the resources for complete code reviews, it is a popular practice to check only 20-30% of the code written. So all developers will have to keep their code in shape to ensure quality.

Code should be Crystal Clear

If a developer is going to submit code for review, it is crucial to ensure that the code is crystal-clear and doesn’t require additional comments.

While submitting the code, the developer should provide the necessary context for the reviewer so that they can look into the code.

Define the Goal

One of the main goals of a code review is to identify issues. However, the goal for each review depends on the current project timelines and team rules.

See also  What is Extreme Programming(XP) Practice?

Are developers focused on how the code represents the required functionality, or they want to adhere to the code standard? Typically, developers do not have enough time to fulfil all of the above-mentioned goals, so they have to determine the most important ones.

Developers try to write the best and most error-free code possible, as teams hardly have any time for additional code reviews.

Further see:

Effective Code Reviews 

QA managers struggle to make code reviews more effective. But how is it possible to make code reviews more effective? It is only possible to set quantifiable goals.

For instance, developers can quantify the code quality based on the number of support tickets over time, or based on the number of defects introduced by development.

It is also important to pay attention to factors such as defect rate, defect intensity, and inspection rate and use tools to work as metrics. Unfortunately, teams do not take advantage of such tools.

Developers can check review effectiveness manually, by writing their own critical defects that were identified during the review process.


These tips should be helpful in optimizing the code review services. The workflow determines how you manage code versions, where teams upload new chunks of code, how reviewers review that code, and much more.

These services include checking the code thoroughly from all aspects to check code quality that sets the base for a quality software application.

Share and Enjoy !

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *