What are the Challenges in Testing Process?

0
678
Spread the love
  • 121
  • 90
  • 85
  • 95
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • 10
  •  
  •  
    401
    Shares

As automation has to do more than traditional QA, planing is extremely important and lack of that contributes to Automated Testing challenges.(DevOps Testing issues or Software Testing challenges).

Proper planing is must-
Proper planing is must-

How to resolve?

  • I am not against the idea of referencing an old template but we need to periodically update as per project need and latest market trends. All the excess baggage of any organization needs to omitted.
  • We need to create  a solid knowledge transition plan from different stakeholders that needs to smooth .
  • We need to create plan for designing,development,test case preparation,test data acquisition,test execution,leverage of  automation,bug fixes etc.
  • Our plan must include the requirement vs developed vs tested tractability.
  • It is always better to use Jira,ALM,OTM or other test management tool instead of traditional Excel.

Attrition/Team Change/Project change-Top challenges in Testing

Expanding compensations and advantages making numerous representatives leave the organization at short vocation interim. The executives are confronting difficult issues to adapt to the wearing down rate.
Difficulties – New test engineers require venture preparing from the earliest starting point, complex undertakings are hard to comprehend, delay in delivery date!
These are some best programming testing difficulties we face day by day. Task achievement or disappointment depends generally on how you address these essential issues.
I think this aspect contributes to all areas and a major contributor to Automated Testing challenges(DevOps Testing issues or Software Testing challenges).

Lack of Training-(DevOps Testing issues/QA challenges)

The expertise of Test engineers turns out to be imperative when we talk about effective testing. Beginning from prerequisite examination to experiment creating to bug logging to client confronting, Test engineers play a more prominent job. So while enlisting a test engineer, the executives ought to be extremely clear about the range of abilities they need and the range of abilities the individual is having who is getting selected.

Regularly this area makes a great deal of vagueness between the groups. Regardless of whether to end up an effective test engineer one need a decent comprehension of the usefulness of an application, innovation, correspondence expertise, prerequisite comprehension for a superior arrangement. As I said test engineers have an immense job to display the testing procedure, all these ability matters.

Get ISTQB certification guideline to become a certified Tester.

Testing is not natural instinct. Hence a tester needs time to learn these testing techniques.Management and testers hardly knows the new trend in the industry. This results  a lack of testing knowledge in the budding experts and results in Automated Testing challenges(DevOps Testing issues or Software Testing challenges).

Training in Testing
Training in Testing

How to resolve?

  • Encourage test engineers to opt for quality testing related new letters.
  • Prompt organizations to organize for formal training on testing for testers.
  • Make sure test engineers go for certifications.
  • Encourage test engineers to attend testing conference.
  • Prompt organization to spend money on online libraries to educate testers.

Tendency to test only happy path-Software Testing challenges:

Software testing is inadequate if none knows whether or not the software is any good until customers complain or the system crashes. Nobody understands 100% testing is not possible.Nobody can predict that there is no bug in the system.We should not only consider the happy path while testing even if in a time crunch situation.

It is also seen in agile based automation testing world resulting Automated Testing challenges(DevOps Testing issues or Software Testing challenges).

How a process related to a company impact testing?

This is one of the contributing points which prompts test engineer’s disarray. I have worked in an organization where few arrangements of experiments need to include before you begin your genuine testing. Individuals as me didn’t comprehend why this should have been finished.

Wrong process to milk customer

No significance of these yet at the same time need to join to show up the Test case number tally. Truly, you read it accurately, just to show up the number of experiments a couple of additional tests dependably there in the report, brought about the pass rate high. This helped the group to charge more to the client. (A wrong approach that earned cash).

Wrong agreements
Wrong agreements

The bad knowledge transfer agreement

Putting every one of these cases brought about the postponement in the testing procedure. The lack of information on the application(KT) is likewise a sub supporter of this classification. Then again, the development group can likewise postpone the procedure. According to the association, a bug must be logged according to Company explicit template.

Wrong process agreement about bug

Even if the development group knew the deformity, they just purchase time by sending the bug for revise in documentation section!!!. Subsequent to finding the bug there are such huge numbers of documentation should be done, the testing procedure turns out to be slower.

Wrong automation scope agreement

Testing in Automation ought not to comprise just complex streams. It ought to incorporate straightforward streams like-limit or boundary testing, field level validation and so forth. We by and large will, in general, miss this angle.

I have seen people going for test automation just because they want to go for this exciting buzzword. To be truthful, i have seen customers are going for this as they wants to certify their product as “Automation tested”.Now it is in the basket for the vendors.
there are two possible cases..
1. Vendors will automate by anyway.
2. They will leave some testceses as they are not automable.

The second scenario will really pathetic.They (the test cases which has been dropped by vendor itself)will be skipped for every scenario / Releases.This contributes to Automated Testing challenges.

Wrong expectation set for client

The customer while has given the project said clearly that this has to be automated.The vendors/Testers took the project and billing the customer for automation.So in the former stage if it is said”We are unable to automate!!!!!” This will create noise to customer end and vendor may loose the project.On the other hand if that portion is skipped.This portion will be hidden to client.which is again detrimental to health for customer in the later stage.

It is generally realized in the very end that automation has not given intended returns.I would suggest that before even thinking of Automation a thorough study of your application/system/module should be performed.The following types of test cases are preferred (but not limited to) choice for automation:

Tests that need to run for every build.In the time of regression the previous releases has to be run.
Tests that use multiple data values for same action.This is popularly used,even data pumping is also an agenda for it.
Identical tests that need to be executed using different browsers The following types are not Browser Compatibility Testing.

Don't miss out!
Subscribe To Newsletter

Receive top technical news, lesson ideas, travel tips and more!

Invalid email address
Give it a try. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Spread the love
  • 121
  • 90
  • 85
  • 95
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • 10
  •  
  •  
    401
    Shares

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here